Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied as he does not have a current disability for VA purposes.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for neck, left shoulder, right shoulder, left wrist, and right wrist disorders are remanded due to the need for additional development of his treatment records from Community Care providers.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for left foot and right foot disorders are remanded due to the need for an adequate opinion addressing whether these disabilities are related to service.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a sleep disorder, including sleep apnea, is remanded due to the need for an adequate opinion addressing whether this disability is related to service or aggravated by his service-connected tinnitus.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and head injury (claimed as CTE) are remanded due to the need for an adequate opinion addressing whether these disabilities are related to service.

The deciding factor: The Veteran does not have a current hearing loss disability for VA purposes.,Additional development is needed to determine if the Veteran's joint and foot disabilities are related to service.,An adequate opinion is needed regarding whether the Veteran's sleep disorder, including sleep apnea, is related to service or aggravated by his service-connected tinnitus.,An adequate opinion is needed addressing whether the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder and head injury (claimed as CTE) are related to service.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, neck disorder, left shoulder disorder, right shoulder disorder, left wrist disorder, right wrist disorder, left foot disorder, right foot disorder, sleep disorder (including sleep apnea), acquired psychiatric disorder (including depression with anger and aggression), head injury (claimed as CTE)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 8, 2022
Citation
22044905

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22044905.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.