The Board has found the medical opinions inadequate and remanded for further clarification on the etiology of the Veteran's vasculitis episode in 2013, specifically regarding its relation to service, presumed exposure to herbicide agents, and any aggravation by a service-connected disability.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for additional medical opinions that address the specific issues raised by the Board's prior remands.
- Claimed conditions
- vasculitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 30, 2022
- Citation
- 22055677
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22055677.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found new and relevant evidence that warrants readjudication of the claim for service connection for an autoimmune disorder, including Wegener's granulomatosis, vasculitis, arthropathy, sensitivity to cold, and loss of two fingertips. The case is being remanded for further review.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete VA examinations and a duty to assist error, requiring further evaluation of the Veteran's left leg sores from vasculitis.
- Denied
The Veteran's cause of death was due to heart failure, cardiomyopathy, ischemic cardiac disease with vasculitis, diabetes, and osteomyelitis. The Board denied service connection for the Veteran's cause of death as there is no evidence of herbicide exposure or a service-connected disability that contributed to his death.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, hypertension, blood clots, and vasculitis have been denied as there is no evidence of herbicide exposure or in-service injury. The Board found that the Veteran did not serve within Vietnam and thus could not establish exposure to herbicide agents.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.