Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is not service-connected due to lack of in-service onset or continuity of symptomatology.,Service connection for a disability of the upper extremities, to include thoracic neuropathy, is denied as there is no current diagnosis and no evidence linking it to service.,Service connection for a bilateral ankle and feet disability is remanded as the VA examiner found a negative nexus to service.,Service connection for a bilateral leg and knee disability is remanded as the VA examiner found a negative nexus to service.,Service connection for a lumbar disorder, claimed as lumbar radiculopathy, is remanded as the VA examiner found a negative nexus to service.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's current hearing loss was not shown in service and continuity of symptomatology has not been established. The VA audiologist opined that bilateral hearing loss was less likely than not related to his military service.,There is no evidence of a current diagnosis of thoracic neuropathy or any other upper extremity disability, nor is there evidence linking it to service. The Veteran's lay assertions are outweighed by the competent medical opinion.,The VA examiner found that the Veteran's bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy developed prior to complaints of chronic back pain and thus ruled out a nexus to his combat service in Vietnam.,The VA examiner found no evidence linking the Veteran's knee disabilities to service, including physical stress from combat service. The 2017 arthroscopic surgery is noted but not explained as related to service.,The VA examiner found that the Veteran's lumbar spine conditions developed after his military service and are unrelated to any physical stress during service.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, upper extremity disability (claimed as thoracic neuropathy), bilateral ankle and feet disability, bilateral leg and knee disability, lumbar disorder (claimed as lumbar radiculopathy)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 30, 2022
Citation
22055702

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22055702.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.