Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

Service connection is granted for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus as these conditions are presumed to have been incurred in service.,Service connection is also granted for tinnitus as it is proximately due to a service-connected disability (bilateral hearing loss).,Service connection is denied for COPD, as there is no evidence of its onset within one year after the last date of herbicide exposure and no other basis for presumptive service connection.,Service connection is denied for bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy due to lack of evidence showing it became manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more within a year after the last date of herbicide exposure.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's hearing loss and tinnitus are presumed to have been incurred in service based on continuous symptoms since separation from service.,Tinnitus is considered a symptom associated with bilateral hearing loss, which was found to be incurred in service due to noise exposure during active duty.,COPD is not considered a presumptively service-connected condition for herbicide exposure and no evidence supports its onset within one year of the last date of exposure. The Veteran's smoking history is also noted as a contributing factor.,Bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy does not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection based on herbicide exposure, as it did not manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more within a year after the last date of exposure.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 6, 2022
Citation
22067243

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22067243.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.