Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's COPD is granted as related to in-service exposure to asbestos and construction particulates.,Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, including PTSD, anxiety, other specified trauma-related disorder, or depression, is denied due to lack of a valid diagnosis under DSM-5 criteria.,Bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are denied as not having manifested within one year of separation from service or being otherwise related to service exposure.,Service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus is denied.

The deciding factor: The opinion provided by Dr. C.K. supports the claim that COPD is related to in-service asbestos exposure, while VA examiners found no evidence of PTSD under DSM-5 criteria and concluded there was insufficient evidence linking bilateral hearing loss or tinnitus to service.,VA examiners did not find a valid diagnosis of an acquired psychiatric disability under DSM-5 criteria. The Veteran's symptoms were considered inconsistent with the diagnostic criteria for PTSD, anxiety, other specified trauma-related disorder, or depression.,Service treatment records are silent on complaints, treatment, or diagnoses related to bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus. VA conceded hazardous noise exposure but denied service connection due to lack of evidence showing manifestation within one year of separation or being otherwise related to service.,VA examiners found no valid diagnosis for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, concluding they were not related to in-service noise exposure.

Claimed conditions
respiratory disability (COPD), acquired psychiatric disability, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 27, 2022
Citation
22071586

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22071586.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.