Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied as new and material evidence was not submitted.,The claim for service connection for headaches, right knee disability, and tinnitus has been reopened and granted to the extent of these issues.,The claim for service connection for a respiratory disability (lung damage) is denied due to lack of current diagnosis or functional impairment.,A rating higher than 20 percent for degenerative arthritis of the spine is remanded as no VA examination was conducted in conjunction with this claim.,Service connection for PTSD is remanded as the incident basis for the claim has not been corroborated.,The claims for service connection for a right hand disability and right wrist disability are remanded due to lack of evidence linking these disabilities to service.

The deciding factor: No new and material evidence was submitted to reopen the claim for bilateral hearing loss.,New and material evidence related to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claims for headaches, right knee disability, and tinnitus. The Veteran's assertions were considered credible.,The current diagnosis of a respiratory disability (lung damage) is not shown by the evidence of record.,No VA examination was conducted in conjunction with this claim due to the correctional facility's refusal to allow transportation.,Corroboration of the incident basis for PTSD has not been provided, thus service connection cannot be established.,The claims for right hand and right wrist disabilities are remanded as there is no evidence linking these conditions to service.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, right knee disability, headaches, tinnitus, respiratory disability (lung damage), degenerative arthritis of the spine, PTSD, right hand disability, right wrist disability
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 10, 2023
Citation
23001457

Veterans Law Judge

Marissa Caylor

Decisions by this judge: 622 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23001457.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.