The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence being associated with the claims file after the issuance of the June 2022 supplemental statement of the case, and it is unclear if this evidence is relevant or how it affects the rating for bilateral high frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
The deciding factor: The Board found that additional relevant evidence had been received after the issuance of a supplemental statement of the case but did not determine its relevance to the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral high frequency sensorineural hearing loss
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 31, 2023
- Citation
- 23006086
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23006086.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for his bilateral high frequency sensorineural hearing loss is remanded due to the need for a new VA examination and additional records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete audiometric results from a VA audiological evaluation in July 2021. The Veteran's hearing loss condition is being reviewed for appropriate disability ratings.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for tinnitus and bilateral hearing loss disability due to a lack of VA examination records from the Veteran's second period of Reserve service. The AOJ must obtain these records, schedule the Veteran for an in-person examination, and provide opinions on whether it is at least as likely as not that the conditions are related to his military service.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed for the issues of service connection for scalp condition, sleep apnea, urinary incontinence, hammer toe (right and left feet), right shoulder disability, left shoulder disability, neck disability, acquired psychiatric disability; rating for urinary incontinence, in excess of 10 percent prior to October 18, 2019 and in excess of 20 percent thereafter; earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for urinary incontinence; hammer toe (right and left feet); right shoulder disability; left shoulder disability; neck disability; acquired psychiatric disability. The Veteran's appeal has also been dismissed for issues regarding an increased rating for diabetes mellitus, bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, and earlier effective dates for those conditions.,The Veteran's migraine headache disability was granted service connection as secondary to his service-connected bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.