The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied as he does not have a current disability that meets the VA definition of hearing loss.,The Board finds that additional development is necessary to determine whether the Veteran's right knee and hip conditions are secondary to his left ankle fracture, or if they were aggravated by such condition. The claims are therefore remanded for further action.,Similarly, the Board finds that additional development is necessary to determine whether the Veteran's left hip condition is secondary to his left ankle fracture, or if it was aggravated by such condition. The claims are therefore remanded for further action.,The Board also finds that additional development is necessary to determine whether the Veteran's IBS disability is due to Gulf War Illness. The claims are therefore remanded for further action.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is granted as it is at least as likely as not related to his military service, specifically his time in the Gulf War.
The deciding factor: There is no diagnosis of a bilateral hearing loss disability, as defined by VA regulations, at any time post-service.,The April 2018 VA examiner did not provide sufficient rationale for their negative nexus opinions regarding secondary service connection. The examiner solely relied on the absence of an altered gait and did not address whether the Veteran's conditions were aggravated by his service-connected residuals of left ankle fracture.,The April 2018 Gulf War VA examiner provided a negative opinion based primarily on the lack of objective medical record evidence to indicate that the Veteran's constipation during service did not resolve without residual. The examiner did not address whether the Veteran's IBS was aggravated by his service-connected residuals of left ankle fracture.,The April 2018 Gulf War VA examiner provided a negative opinion based primarily on the lack of objective medical record evidence to indicate that the Veteran's constipation during service did not resolve without residual. The examiner did not address whether the Veteran's IBS was aggravated by his service-connected residuals of left ankle fracture.,The April 2018 Gulf War VA examiner provided a negative opinion based primarily on the lack of objective medical record evidence to indicate that the Veteran's constipation during service did not resolve without residual. The examiner did not address whether the Veteran's IBS was aggravated by his service-connected residuals of left ankle fracture.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral hearing loss, right knee condition, right hip condition, left hip condition, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 6, 2023
- Citation
- 23007441
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23007441.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and a ruptured right ear drum was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was noted upon entry into active duty service and did not increase in severity during service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for bilateral hearing loss, migraine headaches, and PTSD due to additional development of records and examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim, specifically needing an addendum opinion from a VA examiner. The Veteran will be asked to provide any missing records and former employers' information.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.