Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for OSA has been reopened and granted.,Service connection is granted for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD related to military service.,Service connection is granted for tinnitus, with the onset likely during service aboard the U.S.S. Bataan.,Service connection is remanded for bilateral hearing loss due to potential noise exposure in service.,An initial rating in excess of 10 percent is remanded for left knee disability and right knee disability.

The deciding factor: New evidence received since the final May 2010 decision includes VA treatment records documenting OSA diagnosis, raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.,The Veteran's in-service psychiatric treatment and reports of fear of hostile military activity are considered positive nexus opinions between his current acquired psychiatric disorder and service.,The Veteran reported continuous tinnitus symptoms since service, supported by lay statements and VA records. The Board finds these assertions credible.,No STRs for hearing loss were found; however, the Veteran's history of noise exposure in service is noted. A VA examination is needed to determine current severity and etiology.,The Veteran reported snoring and apneic episodes during service aboard the U.S.S. Bataan. The examiner should consider these reports and assess whether OSA onset was related to service.,VA examinations are required for both knees due to the Veteran's testimony of worsening symptoms since the last examination.

Claimed conditions
obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), acquired psychiatric disorder, tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, left knee patellofemoral syndrome (left knee disability), right knee patellofemoral syndrome (right knee disability)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 12, 2023
Citation
23022155

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23022155.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.