Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

Service connection is granted for right ear sensorineural hearing loss, left ear sensorineural hearing loss, and tinnitus.,Service connection is denied for unspecified depressive disorder, right ankle degenerative arthritis, left ankle degenerative arthritis, right knee osteoarthritis status post total replacement, left knee osteoarthritis status post meniscal tear repair, right hip degenerative arthritis, left hip degenerative arthritis and femoral acetabular impingement syndrome, right wrist degenerative arthritis, left wrist degenerative arthritis, right shoulder acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear status post total replacement, left shoulder acromioclavicular osteoarthritis, right lateral epicondylitis, left lateral epicondylitis, neck pain, lumbar spine DJD, spinal stenosis, degenerative disc disease (DDD), lumbosacral strain, and radiculopathy.,Service connection is denied for coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and hypertensive heart disease.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not show a psychological injury or event during service that could have caused the current unspecified depressive disorder. The current condition was not caused by or worsened in severity by the service-connected bilateral feet calluses.,The Veteran was exposed to loud noise (acoustic trauma) during service, which is considered hazardous exposure. The current hearing loss and tinnitus are etiologically related to this exposure.,There was no relevant respiratory injury or disease during service and symptoms of OSA were not present during service. The current condition is not etiologically related to service.,The evidence does not show a cardiovascular injury, disease, event, or 'chronic' symptoms of hypertensive heart or coronary artery disease during service. Symptoms did not manifest to a compensable degree within one year of service and were not continuous since service separation. The current heart disabilities are not etiologically related to service.,There was no relevant ankle injury, disease, event, or 'chronic' symptoms of left knee or hip degenerative arthritis during service. Symptoms did not manifest to a compensable degree within one year of service and were not continuous since service separation. The current ankle, knee, and hip disabilities are not etiologically related to service.,There was no relevant wrist injury, disease, event, or 'chronic' symptoms of wrist or shoulder arthritis during service. Symptoms did not manifest to a compensable degree within one year of service and were not continuous since service separation. The current wrist, shoulder, and elbow disabilities are not etiologically related to service.,There was no neck injury, disease, or event during service. The current condition is etiologically related to service.,The evidence shows a low back injury during INACDUTRA. The current back disabilities are etiologically related to service.

Claimed conditions
unspecified depressive disorder, right ear sensorineural hearing loss, left ear sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart disease, right ankle degenerative arthritis, left ankle degenerative arthritis, right knee osteoarthritis status post total replacement, left knee osteoarthritis status post meniscal tear repair, right hip degenerative arthritis, left hip degenerative arthritis and femoral acetabular impingement syndrome, right wrist degenerative arthritis, left wrist degenerative arthritis, right shoulder acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear status post total replacement, left shoulder acromioclavicular osteoarthritis, right lateral epicondylitis, left lateral epicondylitis, neck pain, lumbar spine DJD, spinal stenosis, degenerative disc disease (DDD), lumbosacral strain, and radiculopathy
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 13, 2023
Citation
23055970

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23055970.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.