The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient opinions regarding the gall bladder condition and its connection to the VA treatment. The Veteran's claims will be reviewed again with additional medical opinions.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for further clarification of whether the gall bladder removal was a known risk or an accident not reasonably foreseeable, as well as if it resulted from early discharge from the hospital.
- Claimed conditions
- gall bladder condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 9, 2023
- Citation
- 23060450
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 23060450.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for bruising due to lack of a current diagnosis. The claims for breast tumors, gall bladder condition, and colon polyps are remanded as the evidence does not include an opinion on their relationship to active duty service or any toxic exposures.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted a 60 percent evaluation for gastrointestinal conditions, but denied higher ratings and earlier effective dates.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the appellant's request for attorney fees based on past-due benefits awarded in April 2022, as the initial decision granting service connection and a rating was not appealed or filed within one year of receipt.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to errors in obtaining pre-decisional duty-to-assist information and records, as well as for an addendum VA medical opinion addressing all theories of entitlement raised by the Veteran.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.