Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's tinnitus is found to be related to his in-service noise exposure and has persisted since service.,Hypercholesterolemia is not considered a disability for VA compensation purposes, thus the claim cannot be granted.,There is no current diagnosis of hemorrhoids or renal dysfunction. The Veteran's complaints are deemed subjective and self-reported without objective evidence supporting these conditions.,The Veteran has bilateral hearing loss, cervical spine degenerative arthritis, and nephrolithiasis which were diagnosed post-service but not related to service.,Service connection for bilateral hearing loss is remanded as the etiology of the condition remains unclear.,Service connection for cervical spine disability (degenerative arthritis) is remanded due to insufficient evidence linking the current condition to service.,Service connection for nephrolithiasis is remanded as there are no definitive diagnoses prior to the Veteran's claims.

The deciding factor: The July 2018 VA Hearing Loss examination failed to consider the Veteran's lay statements regarding his hearing loss and its onset during service.,Hypercholesterolemia is not a compensable disability, thus the claim cannot be granted.,VA examiners found no objective evidence of hemorrhoids or renal dysfunction in post-service records, despite the Veteran's subjective reports.,The etiology of the Veteran's hearing loss and cervical spine condition remains unclear without further examination or medical opinion.,Service connection for bilateral hearing loss is remanded due to insufficient evidence linking current hearing loss to service.,Service connection for cervical spine disability (degenerative arthritis) is remanded as there are no definitive diagnoses prior to the Veteran's claims.,Service connection for nephrolithiasis is remanded as there are no definitive diagnoses prior to the Veteran's claims.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, hypercholesterolemia, hemorrhoids, renal dysfunction, bilateral hearing loss, cervical spine disability (degenerative arthritis), nephrolithiasis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 27, 2023
Citation
23062459

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23062459.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.