Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's tinnitus claim is denied as the maximum schedular rating has been assigned.,The claim for service connection for sleep apnea was previously denied, but reopened due to new and material evidence. The issue remains on appeal.,The Veteran's degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine, radiculopathy of the right lower extremity, radiculopathy of the left lower extremity, status post left knee injury with mild arthritis, otitis media, and hearing loss are all remanded for further evaluation.,The Veteran's service connection claim for sleep apnea is remanded as new evidence has been received. The issue remains on appeal.,The Veteran's TDIU claim is also remanded due to the inextricably intertwined nature with other issues.

The deciding factor: The maximum schedular rating of 10 percent for tinnitus has already been assigned, and additional evidence does not warrant a higher rating under the applicable criteria.,New and material evidence was received that relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim for service connection for sleep apnea (whether it is related to service).,The Veteran's disabilities have not been evaluated in over five years, and further evaluation is needed to determine their current severity. The VA examinations from 2018 are outdated.,The Veteran has not provided any lay or medical evidence indicating that his sleep apnea was caused by VA treatment. A VA examination with etiological opinion is necessary.,Under the PACT Act, development for toxic exposure risk activities (TERAs) is required as the Veteran served in the Persian Gulf and may have been exposed to toxic substances.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine, radiculopathy, right lower extremity, raticulopathy, left lower extremity, status post, left knee injury with mild arthritis, otitis media, hearing loss
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 29, 2023
Citation
23063223

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23063223.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.