Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's left ear hearing loss is granted as service-connected, while his right ear hearing loss remains denied.,Compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for complications resulting from dental surgery is remanded due to incomplete records and need for a VA examination.,Service connection for stroke residuals secondary to dental surgery and/or TBI is remanded as the evidence is insufficient to determine causation.,Service connection for ataxia secondary to TBI and/or stroke residuals is remanded due to insufficient medical opinion regarding its relationship to service-connected conditions.,Service connection for vertigo secondary to dental surgery and/or TBI is remanded because of incomplete records and need for a VA examination.,Service connection for bilateral eye condition secondary to TBI is remanded as the evidence is insufficient to determine causation.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's left ear hearing loss was found to be related to service exposure, while right ear hearing loss did not meet criteria for a disability for VA purposes.,Incomplete records and need for a full copy of informed consent document are required before determining if there is fault on the part of VA in providing care without informed consent.,The Veteran's stroke residuals may have been caused by arteriosclerosis rather than TBI, as no well-controlled research supports CVA resulting from TBI unless related to DVT.,Insufficient medical opinion regarding whether ataxia was aggravated by service-connected conditions or dental surgery.,Incomplete records and need for a VA examination are required before determining if the Veteran's vertigo is secondary to dental surgery or TBI.,Insufficient medical opinion regarding whether bilateral eye condition is related to service-connected conditions.

Claimed conditions
Left ear hearing loss, Right ear hearing loss, Stroke residuals, Ataxia, Vertigo, Bilateral eye condition
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 14, 2023
Citation
23066145

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23066145.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.