Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service-connected, with the Board finding that it is at least as likely as not related to in-service hazardous noise exposure.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is denied as service-connected, with the Board concluding that there is no persuasive evidence showing a nexus between his current condition and active service.,PTSD is remanded for further development including verification of stressors and provision of a VA psychiatric opinion.,An acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD (to include depression and anxiety) is also remanded, with the same considerations as PTSD.,Essential tremors of the left and right hands are remanded due to their potential connection to PTSD or an acquired psychiatric disorder.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's tinnitus was found to be related to in-service hazardous noise exposure, which is considered a direct service connection case.,For bilateral hearing loss, there was no persuasive evidence showing a nexus between the current condition and active service. The Veteran had stable audiograms at entry and exit, indicating no significant hearing loss during service.,PTSD requires verification of stressors based on personal assault or other verified events. Without this information, it is not possible to determine if PTSD is related to service.,An acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD (to include depression and anxiety) also requires verification of stressors and a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of any diagnosed conditions.,Essential tremors are remanded as they may be related to PTSD or an acquired psychiatric disorder, necessitating further development in these areas.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), an acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD, to include depression and anxiety, essential tremors of the left and right hands
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 19, 2023
Citation
23066732

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23066732.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.