The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the right knee disability was dismissed as a matter of law due to the finality of the September 1989 rating decision.,The claims for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were denied without assigning an earlier effective date because no communication prior to October 6, 2017 can be interpreted as an informal petition to reopen or service connection claim.,The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his right knee disability was denied.
The deciding factor: The September 1989 rating decision is final and cannot be reopened without violating the prohibition against freestanding earlier effective date claims found in Rudd v. Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 296 (2006).,No communication prior to October 6, 2017 can be interpreted as an informal petition to reopen or service connection claim for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus.,The effective date of the increased rating must be based on the earliest date of which it is ascertainable that an increase in disability had occurred.
- Claimed conditions
- right knee disability, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 28, 2023
- Citation
- 23068182
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 23068182.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and a ruptured right ear drum was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess his bilateral knee and hip disabilities.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was noted upon entry into active duty service and did not increase in severity during service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to incomplete medical records and need for further examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.