Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection are denied.,The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and opinions.,New evidence has been received to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for a low back disability, but further examination is needed.,A VA examination is required to determine if the Veteran has bilateral hearing loss or skin disabilities related to his military service.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for a skin disability and left knee disability are remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and opinions.,A VA examination is required to determine if the Veteran's left knee disability is related to his military service.

The deciding factor: There were no pending claims or new evidence received prior to October 23, 2015 that would warrant an earlier effective date for the granted conditions.,The claims are remanded as there is insufficient evidence to determine if the Veteran's disabilities are related to his military service without further examination and opinion.,New evidence has been submitted but does not provide sufficient information to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for a low back disability. Further examination may be needed to establish this relationship.,The Veteran needs an updated VA examination to determine if he currently has bilateral hearing loss or skin disabilities related to his military service.,The claims are remanded as there is insufficient evidence to determine if the Veteran's skin and left knee disabilities are related to his military service without further examination and opinion.,A VA examination is required to determine if the Veteran's left knee disability is related to his military service.

Claimed conditions
migraine headaches, tinnitus, low back disability, bilateral hearing loss, skin disability, left knee disability
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 8, 2024
Citation
24001264

Veterans Law Judge

TANYA SMITH

Decisions by this judge: 1,828 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24001264.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.