Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service-connected.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD) are remanded for further evaluation.,The Veteran's headache condition, hypertension, and GERD are each remanded for further evaluation.,The Veteran's service connection claims for a headache condition, hypertension, and GERD are remanded due to the inextricability of these issues with his acquired psychiatric disorder claim.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is remanded for an examination to determine its etiology.,The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service-connected.

The deciding factor: The Board finds that the Veteran has a current diagnosis of tinnitus and grants service connection based on his lay statements regarding in-service noise exposure.,The Veteran did not undergo a formal audiological evaluation to determine if he had hearing loss, so remand is necessary for further examination.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder claim requires development to corroborate stressors and obtain an opinion from a VA psychiatrist.,Remand is necessary due to the inextricability of these issues with his acquired psychiatric disorder claim. The Veteran must undergo a VA examination to evaluate his headache condition, GERD, and hypertension.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was not confirmed as diagnosed, so remand is necessary for further evaluation.,The Veteran's tinnitus is granted based on the evidence of in-service noise exposure.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, an acquired psychiatric disorder (to include post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, and/or polysubstance abuse disorder), headache condition, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 10, 2024
Citation
24001617

Veterans Law Judge

A. C. MACKENZIE

Decisions by this judge: 2,548 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24001617.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.