The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the award of a 40 percent rating for IVDS prior to October 13, 2016 was denied. The Veteran did not file a timely appeal after the November 2011 decision.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for left second toe scar is dismissed as he did not file a timely appeal of the December 2009 rating decision that granted service connection with an effective date of November 26, 2008.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction was denied. The evidence does not show penile deformity or other impairment associated with erectile dysfunction.,The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for IVDS is denied as the evidence does not show ankylosis of the thoracolumbar spine, and there are no incapacitating episodes meeting the criteria for a 60 percent rating under the Formula for Rating IVDS Based on Incapacitating Episodes.,The Veteran's claim for TDIU based on service-connected disabilities is granted as his education and work history prevented him from performing employment duties due to his service-connected disabilities.,The Veteran's claims for bilateral hip disability, right ear hearing loss, PTSD, joint condition, and dental condition are remanded as new evidence has been submitted that may reopen these previously denied claims.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for right ear hearing loss is remanded as new evidence has been submitted that may reopen this previously denied claim.
The deciding factor: There was no evidence of ankylosis or fixation of the thoracolumbar spine to warrant a higher rating under the General Criteria for the Spine.,The Veteran's erectile dysfunction does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating as there is no evidence of deformity, removal or atrophy of the testes, or other impairment associated with erectile dysfunction.,There was no evidence of ankylosis of the thoracolumbar spine to warrant a higher rating under the General Criteria for the Spine. The Veteran's forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine was measured at 25 degrees during flare-ups, which is consistent with the 40 percent rating assigned.,The evidence does not show ankylosis or fixation of the thoracolumbar spine to warrant a higher rating under the General Criteria for the Spine. The Veteran's forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine was measured at 25 degrees during flare-ups, which is consistent with the 40 percent rating assigned.,The evidence does not show ankylosis or fixation of the thoracolumbar spine to warrant a higher rating under the General Criteria for the Spine. The Veteran's forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine was measured at 25 degrees during flare-ups, which is consistent with the 40 percent rating assigned.,The evidence does not show ankylosis or fixation of the thoracolumbar spine to warrant a higher rating under the General Criteria for the Spine. The Veteran's forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine was measured at 25 degrees during flare-ups, which is consistent with the 40 percent rating assigned.,The evidence does not show ankylosis or fixation of the thoracolumbar spine to warrant a higher rating under the General Criteria for the Spine. The Veteran's forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine was measured at 25 degrees during flare-ups, which is consistent with the 40 percent rating assigned.,The evidence does not show ankylosis or fixation of the thoracolumbar spine to warrant a higher rating under the General Criteria for the Spine. The Veteran's forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine was measured at 25 degrees during flare-ups, which is consistent with the 40 percent rating assigned.,The evidence does not show ankylosis or fixation of the thoracolumbar spine to warrant a higher rating under the General Criteria for the Spine. The Veteran's forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine was measured at 25 degrees during flare-ups, which is consistent with the 40 percent rating assigned.,The evidence does not show ankylosis or fixation of the thoracolumbar spine to warrant a higher rating under the General Criteria for the Spine. The Veteran's forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine was measured at 25 degrees during flare-ups, which is consistent with the 40 percent rating assigned.
- Claimed conditions
- Intervertebral disc syndrome (IVDS), lumbar spine, Erectile dysfunction, Left second toe postoperative with residual scar, Bilateral hip disability, Right ear hearing loss, Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Joint condition, Dental condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- January 26, 2024
- Citation
- 24003993
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,614 · Granted: 35% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24003993.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran is granted special monthly compensation (SMC) at the (o) rate and SMC at the (r)(2) rate, effective January 19, 2025. The decision finds that the Veteran's service-connected conditions warrant these awards due to his need for aid and attendance.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of prostate cancer due to VA's failure to notify him of his April 17, 2008, elevated PSA test results and its failure to timely diagnose and properly treat his disease.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for further development due to insufficient evidence and need for additional examinations.
- Dismissed
The appeal for service connection for a right ear hearing loss disability is dismissed. The appeal for service connection for bilateral knee disabilities is denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.