Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied as there is no current disability meeting VA criteria.,The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for tinnitus is denied as the maximum schedular rating has been assigned.,The Veteran's claims for PTSD, lumbar spine disability, right lower extremity radiculopathy, right knee patellofemoral pain syndrome (right knee disability), left ankle sprain, and ingrown right great toenail are remanded due to insufficient evidence of a current disability or service connection.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a left knee disorder is also remanded as the opinion provided by the VA examiner was inadequate.

The deciding factor: There is no current bilateral hearing loss disability meeting VA criteria, and the Veteran has not presented evidence of a current disability or service connection.,The maximum schedular rating (10 percent) for tinnitus has been assigned due to the absence of proof of a present disability.,Insufficient evidence was provided regarding the presence of a current disability or service connection for PTSD, lumbar spine disability, right lower extremity radiculopathy, right knee patellofemoral pain syndrome (right knee disability), left ankle sprain, and ingrown right great toenail. The Veteran's claim for service connection for a left knee disorder is also remanded due to inadequate evidence.,The VA examiner provided an opinion regarding the Veteran's claimed left knee disorder but failed to consider his lay statements concerning the onset and continuity of his symptoms.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Lumbosacral Strain with Degenerative Joint Disease (lumbar spine disability), Radiculopathy, Right Lower Extremity, Right Knee Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (right knee disability), Left Ankle Sprain, Ingrown Right Great Toenail, Left Knee Disorder (claimed)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 3, 2024
Citation
24006070

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24006070.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.