Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's right ear hearing loss is granted as service-connected.,Service connection for bilateral shin splints is denied.,Service connection for plantar fascitis or a bilateral foot condition is remanded.,Service connection for hypertension is remanded.,Service connection for joint pain in the elbows is remanded.,Service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome is remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's right ear hearing loss was found to be related to service due to noise exposure, and reasonable doubt was resolved in his favor.,There is no current diagnosis of bilateral shin splints, and the evidence does not support a connection to service.,Further examination is needed to determine if there is any objective impairment of functioning as a result of an undiagnosed bilateral foot disability related to service.,The examiner was asked to provide opinions regarding whether hypertension had onset in or is otherwise related to active service, and whether the elbow condition had onset in or is otherwise related to active service. The Veteran's chronic fatigue syndrome claim requires further analysis under 38 C.F.R. § 3.317.,The examiner was asked to provide opinions regarding whether the joint pain in the elbows is at least as likely as not attributable to an exposure event while serving in Southwest Asia, and if so, whether it is related to service-connected heart condition/ventricular arrhythmia.,An opinion on whether the Veteran's chronic fatigue syndrome is caused or aggravated by his service-connected heart condition/ventricular arrhythmia was requested.

Claimed conditions
right ear hearing loss, bilateral shin splints, plantar fascitis/bilateral foot condition, hypertension, joint pain in elbows, chronic fatigue syndrome
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 9, 2024
Citation
24007162

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24007162.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.