The Veteran's residuals of right wrist ganglion cyst were granted service connection as it was caused by an in-service right wrist ganglion cyst.,Service connection for a right ankle disability was denied due to the periodic flare ups not being causally related to active duty service.,Service connection for hemorrhoids was denied as there is no current evidence of a disability or impairment associated with them.,The left elbow condition was denied as it did not onset during his active duty service and there were no symptoms reported after separation.,Bilateral hearing loss was denied due to the absence of a current diagnosis meeting VA criteria for a disability.,Service connection for a scar from left inguinal hernia repair was denied as there is no evidence of such a condition.,Right foot condition, including plantar fasciitis, was remanded as further examination and opinion are needed.,Cervical spine condition and high blood pressure were also remanded due to the need for additional medical evaluation.
The deciding factor: The VA medical opinion concluded that the Veteran's current right wrist pain is at least as likely as not caused by his in-service right wrist ganglion cyst.,The VA examiner opined that the Veteran's periodic right ankle flare ups were less likely than not due to active duty service, given no other complaints or treatments until many years later.,VA treatment records do not mention any complaint, diagnosis, or treatment for hemorrhoids. The Veteran has provided no lay evidence supporting this claim.,The VA examiner opined that the left elbow condition was less likely than not caused by his in-service injuries as there is no evidence of a chronic, recurring problem after 1981 and an extended period between evaluations.,VA audiometric findings do not meet the threshold requirements for hearing loss disability under VA regulations. The Veteran does not have current hearing loss disability in either ear.,The VA examination did not include a medical opinion concerning the Veteran's plantar fasciitis, which is needed to determine if it is related to service.,VA MRI of the cervical spine showed disc bulges and bilateral foraminal attenuation from C3/C4 through C6/C7. The Veteran also reported arthritis/rheumatism/bursitis in his separation examination.,The VA examiner did not provide a medical opinion regarding high blood pressure, which is needed to determine if it is related to service.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of right wrist ganglion cyst, a right ankle disability, hemorrhoids, a left elbow condition, bilateral hearing loss, scar from left inguinal hernia repair, right foot condition, to include plantar fasciitis, cervical spine condition, high blood pressure
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 15, 2024
- Citation
- 24008006
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24008006.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and a ruptured right ear drum was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was noted upon entry into active duty service and did not increase in severity during service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for bilateral hearing loss, migraine headaches, and PTSD due to additional development of records and examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim, specifically needing an addendum opinion from a VA examiner. The Veteran will be asked to provide any missing records and former employers' information.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.