Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is currently rated at 10 percent, and a higher rating is denied.,The Veteran's scar(s) of the left foot and lower leg are not compensable under current criteria.,Service connection for degenerative arthritis of the spine and spinal stenosis remains remanded as new evidence may be needed to establish this condition.,A disability rating in excess of 20 percent for residual(s) of left foot fracture; arthritis of the left midfoot and first metatarsophalangeal joint, status post ORIF-screw placement with bone graft is also remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a higher rating as his audiometric results do not indicate an exceptional pattern of hearing impairment or any other disabling effects not considered in Diagnostic Codes 7800-04.,The Veteran's scar(s) are rated under Diagnostic Code 7805, which considers all other scars. The Veteran's scars do not meet the criteria for a compensable rating as they are not painful or unstable and their total area is less than 39 square cm (6 square inches).,Service connection remains remanded because new evidence may be needed to establish degenerative arthritis of the spine and spinal stenosis.,A disability rating in excess of 20 percent for residual(s) of left foot fracture; arthritis of the left midfoot and first metatarsophalangeal joint, status post ORIF-screw placement with bone graft is also remanded as new evidence may be needed to establish this condition.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss, Scar(s) of the Left Foot and Lower Leg (previously rated with arthritis, midfoot and first metatarsophalangeal joint, status post left foot fracture, status post ORIF-screw placement with bone graft), Degenerative Arthritis of the Spine and Spinal Stenosis
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 12, 2024
Citation
A24031275

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24031275.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.