Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Board denied service connection for neck, left shoulder, right shoulder, left foot, and right foot disabilities. Service connection was also denied for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus.,Service connection was not granted for the claimed conditions due to lack of evidence showing a current disability related to service.

The deciding factor: The Veteran did not have diagnosed neck, shoulder, or foot disabilities at any time during or approximate to the pendency of the claims. The Board found that there is no competent and credible evidence linking these disabilities to service.,For bilateral hearing loss, the Board determined that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a hearing disability under 38 C.F.R. § 3.385 at any time during or approximate to the pendency of the claims. The Board also found no evidence showing symptoms or diagnosis within one year after service separation.,For tinnitus, the Board noted that there was no evidence of current tinnitus and did not find a relationship between tinnitus and service.

Claimed conditions
neck disability, left shoulder disability, right shoulder disability, left foot disability, right foot disability, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
October 17, 2024
Citation
24031923

Veterans Law Judge

H. SEESEL

Decisions by this judge: 1,549 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 24031923.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.