Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's right hand calluses are denied as there is no evidence of chronicity of care for his right hand friction burn, and the VA opinions found that it is less likely than not that the current right hand calluses were caused by service. The left ear hearing loss is also denied as the auditory thresholds in both ears did not meet the criteria for a disability.,The Veteran's neck condition, memory loss due to traumatic brain injury, ulnar nerve condition, left hand and right hand nerve conditions, acquired psychiatric disorder (including PTSD), bilateral flat feet and bunions, bilateral hallux valgus/bunions, and bilateral hammer toes are all remanded as further development is needed.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's right hand calluses were not shown to be related to service due to lack of chronicity of care for the friction burn incident. The VA opinions found that it was less likely than not that the current right hand calluses were caused by service.,For left ear hearing loss, the auditory thresholds in both ears did not meet the criteria for a disability as defined by VA regulations.

Claimed conditions
Right hand calluses, Left ear hearing loss, Neck condition, Memory loss due to traumatic brain injury, Ulnar nerve condition, left arm (to include left shoulder, left elbow, left forearm, and left hand), Left hand nerve condition, Right hand nerve condition, Acquired psychiatric disorder, to include PTSD due to military sexual trauma, anxiety disorder, major depression disorder, adjudgment disorder, Bilateral flat feet and bunions, Bilateral hallux valgus/bunions, Bilateral hammer toes, Left foot porokeratosis
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 13, 2024
Citation
24032948

Veterans Law Judge

MATTHEW W. BLACKWELDER

Decisions by this judge: 2,329 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24032948.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.