The Veteran's death was attributed to multiple blunt force injuries sustained in a motorcycle accident, not related to his service-connected conditions. The Board found no evidence linking the cause of death to active duty or service-connected disabilities.
The deciding factor: Multiple blunt force injuries were not shown to be causally or etiologically related to any disease, injury, or incident in service and did not manifest within one year of discharge from service.
- Claimed conditions
- sleep apnea, posttraumatic stress disorder/alcohol use disorder with traumatic brain injury, irritable bowel syndrome with gastroesophageal reflux disease, carpal tunnel syndrome right upper extremity, left shoulder acromioclavicular joint separation with degenerative arthritis, right shoulder strain with degenerative arthritis, voiding dysfunction, carpal tunnel syndrome left upper extremity, right knee instability, left knee arthritis/status post nondisplaced fracture to tip of fibular head knee, right knee arthritis/status post medical meniscus repair, lateral epicondylitis right elbow, lateral epicondylitis left elbow, status post-surgery right thumb fracture, degenerative arthritis thoracolumbar spine, degenerative arthritis cervical spine, left knee instability, residuals right ankle fracture status post-surgical repair and plate insertion, bilateral plantar fasciitis with heel spurs, tinnitus, hypertension, residuals jaw fracture status postsurgical repair, dry eye syndrome, bilateral hearing loss, umbilical (ventral) hernia, erectile dysfunction, anemia iron deficiency, right knee/ankle scars, right thumb scar, left shoulder scar, post concussive headaches, restless leg syndrome bilateral
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 10, 2024
- Citation
- A24036996
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24036996.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and a ruptured right ear drum was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was noted upon entry into active duty service and did not increase in severity during service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.