Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is currently rated at 20 percent, but does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.,The Veteran's tinnitus is assigned the maximum schedular evaluation of 10 percent under Diagnostic Code (DC) 6260.,The Veteran's left inguinal hernia repair does not more nearly approximate a post-operative recurrent inguinal hernia, readily reducible and well supported by a truss or belt, warranting a compensable rating.,The Veteran's posterior trunk scar, post lumbar surgery, and anterior trunk scar, status post hernia repair do not meet the criteria for an initial compensable rating under DC 7802 due to their size and nature.,No effective date provided as this is a denial of claims.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a higher than 20 percent rating based on audiometric test results, which do not show impairment at levels that would warrant such an increase. The Veteran’s tinnitus is rated as the maximum allowed under DC 6260.,The Veteran's left inguinal hernia repair does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating due to lack of evidence of post-operative recurrent hernia, readily reducible and well supported by a truss or belt. The posterior trunk scar and anterior trunk scar do not meet the size requirement for a 10 percent rating under DC 7802.,The Veteran's service connection claims for dental condition and hypertension were previously denied as final due to lack of appeal, so they are not addressed in this decision.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Left Inguinal Hernia Repair, Posterior Trunk Scar (post lumbar surgery), Anterior Trunk Scar (status post hernia repair)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 15, 2024
Citation
A24065849

Veterans Law Judge

Marcus N. Fulton

Decisions by this judge: 785 · Granted: 47% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24065849.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.