Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for bilateral hearing loss is remanded due to the submission of new evidence.,The effective date for service connection for left lower extremity radiculopathy will be set at May 18, 2021, as this was when objective evidence first indicated the condition.,Service connection for hypertension cannot be established as there is no in-service disease or injury linked to the condition and it did not manifest within one year of separation from service.,A rating in excess of 40 percent for gout prior to February 22, 2021, is denied. From that date onwards, a 40 percent disability rating is granted.,Service connection for depressive disorder cannot be established as there is no evidence of an in-service disease or injury linked to the condition.

The deciding factor: The new evidence submitted relates to whether the Veteran has current bilateral hearing loss. The April 2020 denial was based on lack of evidence, and the July 2020 VA examination provided relevant evidence.,Left lower extremity radiculopathy first became ascertainable in May 2021 when the Veteran underwent a VA examination that indicated such condition.,The record does not show hypertension manifested within one year of separation from service. The earliest documented instance was in February 2021, and there is no evidence linking it to service.,Gout prior to February 22, 2021, did not manifest with definite impairment or incapacitating exacerbations as required for a higher rating. From that date onwards, the Veteran's gout has met criteria warranting a 40 percent disability rating.,Depressive disorder is manifested by occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform tasks, which does not meet the severity threshold for an initial rating in excess of 30 percent.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, hypertension, depressive disorder, gout
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 17, 2024
Citation
A24066657

Veterans Law Judge

WILLIAM H. DONNELLY

Decisions by this judge: 1,963 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24066657.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.