Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating of major depressive disorder was denied due to failure to report for a scheduled VA examination without good cause.,The Veteran's appeal for an increase in his bilateral hearing loss disability rating was denied as he refused to attend additional VA examinations without good cause.,The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating of tinnitus was denied because the maximum schedular evaluation has been assigned, and no higher evaluation is warranted based on the current evidence.,Service connection for HIV was denied due to lack of a current disability. The weight of the persuasive evidence did not support finding that the Veteran had HIV.,Service connection for a left ankle disorder was denied as there was no evidence of a chronic left ankle disorder during service or within one year following discharge, and the claimant's statements were insufficient to establish nexus.

The deciding factor: The Veteran failed to report for a scheduled VA examination without good cause, resulting in denial of his increased rating claim for major depressive disorder.,The Veteran refused to attend additional VA examinations without good cause, leading to denial of his increase in bilateral hearing loss disability rating.,The maximum schedular evaluation for tinnitus has been assigned, and no higher evaluation is warranted based on the current evidence. The Veteran's statements were insufficient to establish that he had a current disability.,Service connection was denied as there was no current disability found, and the weight of the persuasive evidence did not support finding that the Veteran had HIV.,Service connection was denied due to lack of a chronic left ankle disorder during service or within one year following discharge. The claimant's statements were insufficient to establish nexus.

Claimed conditions
major depressive disorder, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), left ankle disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 28, 2024
Citation
A24069146

Veterans Law Judge

LAURA E. COLLINS

Decisions by this judge: 715 · Granted: 43% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24069146.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.