Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has found that the appellant does not have a current disability for which service connection can be granted, including for heart conditions, acquired psychiatric disorders (anxiety and depression), hypertension, cervical spine condition, bilateral shoulder conditions, elbow conditions, wrist conditions, hip conditions, knee conditions, ankle conditions, or foot conditions. The claims are being remanded to obtain appropriate medical examinations and opinions.,The Board has found that the appellant does not have a current disability for which service connection can be granted, including for heart conditions, acquired psychiatric disorders (anxiety and depression), hypertension, cervical spine condition, bilateral shoulder conditions, elbow conditions, wrist conditions, hip conditions, knee conditions, ankle conditions, or foot conditions. The claims are being remanded to obtain appropriate medical examinations and opinions.

The deciding factor: The appellant's STRs do not show any diagnosed heart conditions, acquired psychiatric disorders (anxiety and depression), hypertension, cervical spine condition, bilateral shoulder conditions, elbow conditions, wrist conditions, hip conditions, knee conditions, ankle conditions, or foot conditions. The claims are being remanded to obtain appropriate medical examinations and opinions.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss, Vision Disorder, Kidney Condition, Heart Condition, Acquired Psychiatric Disorder (Anxiety, Depression), Hypertension, Cervical Spine Condition, Bilateral Shoulder Conditions (Left and Right), Bilateral Elbow Conditions (Left and Right), Bilateral Wrist Conditions (Left and Right), Bilateral Hip Conditions (Left and Right), Bilateral Knee Conditions (Left and Right), Bilateral Ankle Conditions (Left and Right), Bilateral Foot Conditions (Left and Right)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 4, 2024
Citation
A24071366

Veterans Law Judge

Paul R. Casey

Decisions by this judge: 869 · Granted: 44% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24071366.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.