Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction was denied as there is no evidence of penile deformity.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for right ear hearing loss was denied as his hearing impairment did not meet the criteria for an exceptional pattern and falls within the noncompensable range.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for left ear hearing loss was denied as he does not have hearing loss for VA purposes in that ear.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for lower back pain was denied as there is no evidence of a disability at any time during or approximate to the pendency of the claim.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for allergic rhinitis, for the period from September 14, 2021, to April 11, 2024, was denied as there is no evidence showing greater than 50 percent obstruction of nasal passages on both sides or complete obstruction on one side.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's erectile dysfunction does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under either set of diagnostic criteria due to lack of penile deformity.,The Veteran's right ear hearing loss did not meet the criteria for an exceptional pattern and falls within the noncompensable range based on audiometric results.,There is no evidence showing left ear hearing loss for VA purposes, as required by the rating criteria.,There is no evidence of a lower back disability at any time during or approximate to the pendency of the claim.,The Veteran's allergic rhinitis did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating due to lack of greater than 50 percent obstruction of nasal passages on both sides.

Claimed conditions
Erectile Dysfunction, Right Ear Hearing Loss, Allergic Rhinitis, Left Ear Hearing Loss, Lower Back Pain
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 7, 2024
Citation
A24072948

Veterans Law Judge

RAY BARTO SLABBEKORN, JR.

Decisions by this judge: 719 · Granted: 54% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24072948.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.