Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss has been denied as there is no new and relevant evidence to warrant readjudication.,Service connection for paralysis of the sciatic nerve (peripheral neuropathy, left foot) and right foot have both been granted due to equipoise in the evidence supporting their secondary nature to a service-connected condition.,The Veteran's hypertension has not met the criteria for a compensable rating as his diastolic pressure was never predominantly 100 or more and he does not require continuous medication for control.,Total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) is remanded due to inextricably intertwined with service connection claims.

The deciding factor: The Veteran did not submit new and relevant evidence that would tend to prove or disprove the matter at issue regarding bilateral hearing loss.,The evidence was in equipoise as to whether the Veteran's paralysis of the sciatic nerve (peripheral neuropathy, left foot) and right foot were secondary to a service-connected disability.,The Veteran's hypertension did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating as his diastolic pressure never exceeded 100 or systolic pressure never exceeded 160, nor was he taking continuous medication for control.,The TDIU claim is inextricably intertwined with the service connection claims and thus must be remanded.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, paralysis of the sciatic nerve (peripheral neuropathy, left foot), paralysis of the sciatic nerve (peripheral neuropathy, right foot), hypertension
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 27, 2024
Citation
A24078663

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24078663.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.