The appeal for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a stroke caused by VA treatment has been withdrawn and is dismissed.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew the appeal, and there are no specific errors of fact or law to address.
- Claimed conditions
- cerebral vascular accident (stroke)
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 1, 2025
- Citation
- A25029872
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,680 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25029872.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's hypertension is granted as presumptively related to herbicide exposure during service.,Left leg and neck carotid artery disease are not presumed or directly linked to service, but the appeal is granted due to the PACT Act which now includes this condition in the list of diseases presumptively associated with herbicide exposure.,Cerebral vascular accident (stroke) is not presumed or directly linked to service, and the appeal is denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's stroke is caused or aggravated by his service-connected hypertension. The AOJ must obtain all relevant medical records and provide an appropriate VA examination.
- Granted
The Veteran's hypertension and cerebral vascular accident (stroke) are granted on a secondary basis to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. Service connection for duodenal ulcer with reflux is granted at a 30 percent rating effective September 27, 2011. The sleep disorder claim is denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, an acquired psychiatric disorder (including PTSD and depression), a cerebral vascular accident (stroke) claimed as secondary to an acquired psychiatric disorder, and a lower back disability due to potential issues with service connection evidence and need for additional medical opinions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.