The Veteran's surviving spouse was granted special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for regular aid and attendance of another person due to his service-connected Parkinson's Disease.
The deciding factor: The evidence is relatively balanced that the Veteran required the regular aid and assistance of another person to perform routine activities of daily living due to his service-connected Parkinson's Disease and related conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- Parkinson's Disease, Urinary problems, Bradykinesia with tremor and muscle rigidity, right upper extremity associated with Parkinson's disease, Bradykinesia with tremor and muscle rigidity, left upper extremity associated with Parkinson's disease, Balance impairment associated with Parkinson's disease, Bradykinesia and muscle rigidity, right lower extremity associated with Parkinson's disease, Bradykinesia with tremor and muscle rigidity, left lower extremity associated with Parkinson's disease, Residuals of low back injury, Tinnitus, Speech changes associated with Parkinson's disease, Loss of automatic movements, left side associated with Parkinson's disease, Loss of automatic movements, right side associated with Parkinson's disease, Stooped posture, right side associated with Parkinson's disease, Stooped posture, left side associated with Parkinson's disease, Residuals of traumatic brain injury, Residuals, fracture, left elbow, Residuals, injury, left index finger, Bilateral hearing loss, Loss of smell associated with Parkinson's disease, Cognitive disorder associated with Parkinson's disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 8, 2025
- Citation
- A25032293
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 833 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25032293.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, finding that the Veteran's current conditions are not related to his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for a low back disorder was reopened, and his claims for increased ratings of bilateral knee instability were granted. His hearing loss claim was denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a higher rating for PTSD and dismissed his appeals regarding increased ratings for tinnitus and a right hand disability due to lack of timely filing of Notice of Disagreement.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including GAD, MDD, bruxism, migraines/headaches, tinnitus, hip pain, iliotibial band syndrome, and leg stress fractures. The evidence does not support current diagnoses of these conditions during the appeal period.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.