The appeal is granted for readjudication of the previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus, Type II, as due to exposure to herbicide agents.
The deciding factor: New and relevant evidence has been presented or secured with respect to the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus, Type II, as due to exposure to herbicide agents.
- Claimed conditions
- Diabetes mellitus, Type II
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 2, 2025
- Citation
- A25048484
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,757 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25048484.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for bladder cancer and diabetes mellitus, Type II are remanded due to errors in the VA opinion regarding exposure to herbicides and toxic substances during his military service.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal of a proposed severance of service connection for peripheral neuropathy, secondary to diabetes mellitus type II (DM II), as it was not an adverse final decision by the AOJ.
- Partly granted
The Board granted readjudication of the claims for service connection for congestive heart failure and diabetes mellitus, Type II based on new and relevant evidence.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board denied an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus, Type II and remanded the claims for higher ratings for sciatic neuropathy, femoral neuropathy, PTSD, TDIU, SMC, and DEA benefits.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.