The Board dismissed the motions for revision of clear and unmistakable error in various rating decisions, including those related to service connection and ratings for multiple conditions. The claims for service connection were remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's motions for revision did not satisfy the requirements that a motion for revision due to clear and unmistakable error must be pleaded with specificity and clearly identify any undebatable error of fact or law in the decision resulting in a specific manifestly different outcome.

Claimed conditions

traumatic brain injury (TBI), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with inflammatory bowel disease, plantar fasciitis, hammer toe of the right foot, hammer toe of the left foot, right great toe onychocryptosis, posttraumatic headaches, cervical spine disability, difficulty hearing in noisy situations in the absence of objective hearing loss, right hand strain (to include fingers), left hand strain (to include fingers), right foot hallux valgus, left foot hallux valgus, sore throat, erectile deformity (other than erectile dysfunction), celiac disease, rectal bleeding, high blood pressure, chest pain

How they argued it

Direct service connection

Exposure basis

None

Rating assigned

None in this decision

Decision date

November 12, 2025

Citation

A25098181

Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine