The veteran withdrew his appeal for all service connection and rating claims, resulting in the dismissal of each claim.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal as stated in a March 2025 communication, thus there are no specific errors of fact or law to review.
- Claimed conditions
- cervical strain, migraine headaches, radiculopathy involving the sciatic nerve of the left lower extremity, left shoulder strain, left upper extremity nerve disability, lumbosacral strain, right knee disability, right upper extremity nerve disability, traumatic brain injury (TBI), unspecified depressive disorder with unspecified substance related disorder, bilateral pes planus, chronic skin lesions associated with recurrent methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), dry eye syndrome, erectile dysfunction, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), left ankle disability, left ear hearing loss, left hip disability condition, limitation of flexion due to left knee strain with tendonitis and a meniscal tear, instability due to left knee strain with tendonitis and a meniscal tear, limitation of extension due to left knee strain with tendonitis and a meniscal tear, painful facial scar due to MSRA infection, non-painful facial scars due to MSRA infection, bilateral plantar fasciitis, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), pseudofolliculitis, right ankle disability, right deviated septum, right elbow disability, right shoulder disability, scar on the buttocks due to a MSRA infection, vertigo
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 5, 2025
- Citation
- A25104900
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 3,038 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25104900.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's right shoulder disability and migraines/chronic headaches are remanded for additional development due to insufficient opinions on the etiology of her conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess his bilateral knee and hip disabilities.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has expanded the scope of the claim to include any mental health disorder raised by the record and has remanded for additional development regarding service connection for left leg, ankle, and psychiatric disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.