The Board granted a 20 percent initial rating for bilateral dry eye syndrome and service connection for left knee strain, but denied other claims including increased ratings for right lower extremity radiculopathy, bilateral hearing loss, incomplete right bundle branch block (claimed as cardiac arrhythmia), degenerative disc disease of the thoracolumbar spine with IVDS, scarring of the left inguinal area, status post varicocele surgery, and service connection for left shoulder strain and restless leg syndrome.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on the evidence showing that the Veteran's right lower extremity radiculopathy did not more closely approximate symptoms productive of moderate incomplete nerve paralysis; his bilateral hearing loss was manifested by hearing acuity no worse than Level I in both ears; he experienced bilateral dry eye syndrome with intermittent blurred vision; his service-connected incomplete right bundle branch block (claimed as cardiac arrhythmia) did not require continuous medication for treatment, and there were no findings of unfavorable ankylosis or incapacitating episodes of IVDS; the Veteran's back disability was not manifested by unfavorable ankylosis or incapacitating episodes of IVDS; his scarring of the left inguinal area did not involve any disabling effects; his diagnosed left knee strain is shown to be causally linked to his service-connected spine and right hip symptomatology, but his left shoulder strain and restless leg syndrome are not related to active duty military service.
- Claimed conditions
- right lower extremity radiculopathy, bilateral hearing loss, bilateral dry eye syndrome, incomplete right bundle branch block (claimed as cardiac arrhythmia), degenerative disc disease, thoracolumbar spine, with intervertebral disc disease syndrome (IVDS), scarring of the left inguinal area, status post varicocele surgery, left knee strain, left shoulder strain, restless leg syndrome
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- December 18, 2025
- Citation
- A25109468
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.