The Board decided to reopen and reconsider several claims related to service connection for various conditions. Some claims were dismissed or denied, while others were remanded for further consideration.

The deciding factor: The decision was based on the submission of new and relevant evidence warranting readjudication.

Claimed conditions

cervical spine condition, high blood pressure, right shoulder condition, left shoulder condition, left elbow disability, lumbar spine disability, middle back disability, left lower extremity radiculopathy, sciatic nerve, right lower extremity radiculopathy, sciatic nerve, bilateral hearing loss disability, blurry vision, sleep apnea, left lower extremity radiculopathy, external cutaneous nerve, left lower extremity radiculopathy, ilioinguinal nerve, left lower extremity radiculopathy, obturator nerve, right lower extremity radiculopathy, external cutaneous nerve, right lower extremity radiculopathy, ilioinguinal nerve, right lower extremity radiculopathy, obturator nerve, disfiguring scars, right lower extremity, disfiguring scars, left lower extremity, anterior right foot scar, status post internal fixation with calcaneal spur, left hip disability, right hip disability, left knee disability, right knee disability, ulcers, cervical spine disability, left upper extremity radiculopathy, left lower extremity radiculopathy, femoral nerve, left foot neuropathy, right foot neuropathy, hypertension

How they argued it

Reopened with new and material evidence

Exposure basis

None

Rating assigned

None in this decision

Decision date

January 16, 2025

Citation

A25004167

Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine