Partly granted
The Board dismissed the claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, denied service connection for a respiratory condition, and remanded the claim for dermatitis.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not support a current diagnosis of a respiratory condition or a link to in-service asbestos exposure. The Board found that a VA examination was necessary for the dermatitis claim due to prior duty-to-assist errors.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral hearing loss, Tinnitus, Respiratory condition, Dermatitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 31, 2025
- Citation
- A25009077
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.