The Board has determined that the Veteran requires personal care services due to an inability to perform three ADLs. The appeal is being remanded for further evaluation of whether it is in the best interest of the Veteran to participate in the PCAFC program.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on a discrepancy between the VA Form 10182 and the Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT) review consultation, which found that the Veteran did not meet eligibility requirements for PCAFC. The Board found this conclusion to be erroneous and remanded the case.
- Claimed conditions
- inability to perform one or more activities of daily living (ADL), need for supervision or protection based on symptoms or residuals of neurological or other impairment or injury, need for regular or extensive instruction or supervision without which the ability of the veteran to function in daily life would be seriously impaired
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 8, 2026
- Citation
- A26001846
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A26001846.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The appeal is remanded to determine if the Veteran requires personal care services, supervision or protection based on symptoms or residuals of neurological impairment, and regular or extensive instruction or supervision without which his ability to function in daily life would be seriously impaired.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The appeal is remanded to determine if the Veteran requires personal care services for ADL, supervision or protection based on neurological impairment, or regular instruction due to daily life function issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC should be remanded due to insufficient explanation in the April 2021 decision and a need for further medical opinion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the AOJ decision on appeal is not adequate to inform a decision on the merits and requires additional clarification and development. Specifically, the AOJ did not provide clear explanation for its conclusion that the Veteran does not need personal care services based on an inability to perform ADLs or have a need for supervision, protection, or instruction.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.