Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is rated at zero percent, as the VA examination results do not meet the criteria for a compensable rating.,The Veteran's COPD is currently rated at zero percent, with PFTs showing an FEV-1 of 91% predicted and FEV-1/FVC of 96%, which does not warrant a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 6604.,For lumbosacral strain, degenerative disc disease, the Veteran's current rating is at 20 percent based on forward flexion of 50 degrees and combined range of motion of 125 degrees. The VA examination did not show ankylosis or muscle spasm/severe guarding resulting in abnormal gait or spinal contour.,The Veteran's right groin scar has been rated as zero percent, with no evidence of instability or pain.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating based on audiometric test results and speech recognition scores.,The Veteran's COPD is currently evaluated at noncompensable due to PFT results showing FEV-1 of 91% predicted and FEV-1/FVC of 96%, which do not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 6604.,For lumbosacral strain, degenerative disc disease, the Veteran's current evaluation is at 20 percent based on forward flexion of 50 degrees and combined range of motion of 125 degrees. The VA examination did not show ankylosis or muscle spasm/severe guarding resulting in abnormal gait or spinal contour.,The Veteran's right groin scar has been rated as zero percent due to lack of evidence of instability or pain.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Lumbosacral Strain, Degenerative Disc Disease, Right Groin Scar
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 12, 2026
Citation
A26022465

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A26022465.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.